Criticizing internet discussion is like shooting fish in a barrel. Criticizing internet fandom is like shooting fish in smaller barrel.
I’m about to do both anyways. There’s your disclaimer.
From Engadget: “That’s right, for all their laptop innovations Apple doesn’t seem to have managed to figure out how to keep these Dual Cores cool, and it looks like you might have to resort to thermal paste shenanigans to keeps this thing cool enough to sit on your lap…. Otherwise, the laptop looks like quite the deal and a decent performer.” (emphasis added)
Contrast with comments on the same post: “I’m personally getting pretty tired of the rather skewed view of Apple over here at Engadget.(…) Keep the biased posts to yourselves and give honest reporting to your loyal audience.” Or then there’s “of course, the heat issue is.. not an issue, if you have this thing on a table… It’s not really an Apple engineering PROBLEM as much as it is a DECISION..” And then there’s my favourite, “#2 You’re right, you should stick to PeeCees. Based on your decision making process, you’re too dumb to use anything else.”
As I’m sure the three of you who read this regularly already know, I’m seriously considering buying a MacBook—in fact, the two things keeping me from plunking down the cash right now is a) my overzealous fiscal restraint and b) the thermal grease issue. And though I’ve criticized many things Apple has done in the past, it’s always been with the understanding that because Apple has done so much right in the past decade, they should be held to a higher standard. I own Apple products and will likely continue to buy them.
But let me say this: the worst thing about Apple, by far, are Apple zealots. As far as I’m concerned, you could shove them all into a cannon and fire them into the sun. A laptop should not run at 80 degrees celsius, full stop. Thermal grease is meant to be applied in thin layers, not giant goops.
I guess today I got tired of people claiming that Engadget was anti-Apple, when in reality their definition of “bias” just meant “contrary to what I deem to be the truth.” Stay tuned, folks: tomorrow I’ll take on the current state of internet political debate! Guess what that’ll read like.